A bitter High Court dispute has broken out involving future neighbours above the construction of a wall at a coastal web site in the north Dublin suburb, a circumstance which includes attracted national awareness following an Irish Times report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres over a proposed loved ones dwelling at Sutton Strand, wherever allegations of organizing breaches, environmental considerations, and extensive-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled into your courts. The Irish Times write-up about René Collier plus the Irish Times report about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what started as an area disagreement has progressed right into a highly publicised lawful struggle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing more than development is effective at the site on Dublin Road, Sutton, where by Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a health care provider and an organization director respectively, seek to create their family home. The case is becoming emblematic of wider disputes along Ireland’s coastline, where by growth pressures collide with environmental protections plus the sensitivities of set up people. In accordance with the Irish Times report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall being manufactured by their prospective neighbours goes outside of the boundaries permitted below preparing authorization.
René Collier and Paul Feely, both equally people of Dublin Road, claim that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the terms in their preparing permission by developing a wall beyond the boundaries in their web-site, leading to an encroachment on the Distinctive Area of Conservation. The SAC designation is central to your dispute, as such spots are subject matter to demanding controls underneath European and Irish environmental law. Inside their courtroom filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even minimal encroachments could have Long lasting ecological penalties, especially in a very sensitive coastal surroundings including Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They may be in breach in their setting up permission, and say the wall, which is partly developed, is in the correct place. Their lawful group has characterised the action being an attempt to hold off or frustrate a lawful progress. The couple accuse litigants of in search of to halt homebuilding as a way to maintain their watch, an allegation that has been repeated in court docket and referenced in protection of the situation. This accusation goes to the guts of numerous coastal setting up disputes, the place views of The ocean are both of those very prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Situations report naming René Collier and Paul Feely explained dramatic endeavours with the plaintiffs to doc the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded through ocean in storm to photograph the positioning, In accordance with sworn evidence referenced while in the Irish Situations. In a single account, Rene Collier waded by waist-large h2o for the duration of a storm to photograph the site Irish Instances, a picture that has considering that come to be emblematic in the depth in the dispute. These steps were not basically symbolic; they ended up intended to Assemble visual proof in the wall’s position relative to tidal traces and protected land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the location from your sea Irish Times described, describing how The 2 Gentlemen entered the h2o for the duration of serious climatic conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading through storm drinking water to photograph the internet site became one of the most hanging descriptions to arise from court docket reporting. The Irish Occasions short article about accountant Paul Feely mentioned that these steps were cited to exhibit the plaintiffs’ perception which the wall prolonged into an area impacted by tidal movement, strengthening their argument the SAC was remaining encroached on.
The activities at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 have been included intimately from the national press. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Moments 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Periods January 27 2026 turned greatly searched phrases as readers sought to know the track record and implications of the case. On that date, the High Court heard additional submissions on no matter whether interim orders need to be granted to halt design pending an entire Listening to. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a essential minute from the authorized timeline.
With the core from the dispute is actually a disagreement above boundaries, organizing compliance, and intent. René Collier Irish Times report naming René Collier and Paul Feely and Paul Feely sustain that the wall, as constructed, goes beyond what was authorised and intrudes into secured land. They argue that this is simply not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by occupation, continues to be called meticulous in his evaluation of arranging documents, maps, and circumstances hooked up on the authorization.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have the two pressured that their action is motivated by worry for environmental protection and adherence to scheduling legislation. They reject claims that the situation is about preserving a private watch, insisting as an alternative that it's about guaranteeing that development at Sutton Strand respects authorized and ecological limits. In affidavits, they have got described their prolonged-standing relationship to the realm as well as their awareness of its environmental sensitivity.
On one other side, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed on their own as a pair just endeavoring to develop a spouse and children residence in accordance While using the law. They deny the wall encroaches over a Special Spot of Conservation and say that every one works have already been completed dependant on Expert tips and permitted plans. Their lawyers have argued the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and the remarkable actions of René Collier and Paul Feely, together with entering The ocean during a storm, don't change the underlying details.
The case has also lifted broader questions about how preparing disputes are settled in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter courtroom dispute above building of wall at coastal web site is becoming a shorthand description for any circumstance that lots of observers see as progressively frequent. As sea amounts rise and coastal erosion intensifies, the specific delineation involving personal land, public foreshore, and guarded habitats is now far more contentious.
The Irish Moments write-up about René Collier noted which the businessman had previously been involved with neighborhood advocacy on preparing and environmental problems, nevertheless not at this scale. In the meantime, the Irish Instances article about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how people today from quite distinct professional backgrounds can find them selves aligned in such disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some stories spell their names, have grown to be synonymous with the Sutton Strand situation.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the site through the sea Irish Times coverage emphasised, underlining The weird lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded via waistline-superior water for the duration of a storm to photograph the site Irish Moments and René Collier waded as a result of waist-large drinking water all through a storm to photograph the website Irish Moments are phrases that appeared consistently in protection, reflecting each the Bodily actuality with the coastline as well as symbolic nature from the act. For supporters on the plaintiffs, these actions demonstrated dedication; for critics, they illustrated the things they see as an abnormal technique.
As being the High Court proceedings go on, the result continues to be unsure. The courtroom have to ascertain if the wall as designed complies with setting up authorization and no matter if any encroachment right into a Specific Location of Conservation has occurred. The legal arguments are elaborate, involving interpretation of maps, tidal details, and scheduling disorders. Still the human aspect stays central: neighbours who should live together with each other lengthy once the authorized expenses have been compensated.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing in excess of construction is effective at the location on Dublin Road, Sutton, though the implications of the situation extend outside of that deal with. For planners, builders, and residents alike, the dispute serves for a reminder of the necessity of clarity in arranging permissions and sensitivity in coastal improvement. In addition, it underscores how speedily a local disagreement can escalate when basic concerns for instance environmental safety and residence legal rights are perceived to generally be at stake.
In the meantime, Sutton Strand continues to be a spot of natural natural beauty and contested boundaries. The wall with the centre from the dispute stands partially crafted, a physical manifestation of unresolved authorized thoughts. No matter if it can in the end be altered, eradicated, or finished as prepared will rely upon the courtroom’s findings. Until finally then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their versions will probable continue to seem in headlines, connected indelibly to Just about the most closely watched arranging disputes in north Dublin in recent years.